Home » Posts tagged 'Augustine Gbao'

Tag Archives: Augustine Gbao

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #104

RUF Trial Report: Augustine Gbao Defense Case-In-Chief

2 – 24 June 2008

This report offers a thematic overview and analysis of the evidentiary, legal, procedural, and court management issues that arose during the final session of the Revolutionary United Front (“RUF”) trial,during which the Defense for third accused Augustine Gbao presented its casein-chief. Taken together with similar reports provided by the War Crimes Studies Center during the past four years, it hopes to constitute a helpful record to those who would like to compare each side’s recently-completed final briefs and arguments, as well as the Court’s forthcoming judgment, to the evidence presented. Researchers interested in issues ranging from the evidentiary to the procedural to the administrative will also find it useful. Although the Gbao Defense case was not lengthy, the evidence provided therein has important implications for the RUF trial as a whole (and indeed, the historical record of the war that the Court is creating).

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #102

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 29 June 2007

Early this week, the Prosecution concluded its cross examination of the first accused, Issa Sesay. After Mr. Sesay stepped down, the Defense called its next two witnesses, both civilian women from Kailahun district testifying under protective measures. They were designated DIS-302 and DIS-301. Both women concluded their testimony before court adjourned on the 28th of June. This week’s proceedings brought the summer trial session to a close. As announced earlier this month, the Trial Chamber adjourned a full month earlier than originally anticipated. At close of proceedings, the Presiding Judge announced that trial will resume the 11th of September, 2007.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #98

 

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

29 May – 1 June 2007

First accused, Issa Sesay, concluded direct examination early in the week. Prior to cross  examination, Mr. Sesay’s Counsel, Wayne Jordash attempted to bring a motion to  suppress certain anticipated Prosecution evidence. The Trial Chamber spent a great deal  of time hearing arguments about whether or not it was timely to hear arguments on the  substance of the motion. Ultimately, the Bench barred Defense from bringing the motion  on the grounds that it was premature. The Court also disposed, somewhat obliquely, of  the unresolved matter of translation irregularities raised late last week. After Mr. Jordash concluded direct examination of his client, Counsel for the co-accused proceeded with cross-examination for the remainder of the week.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #84a

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 21 July 2006

The bench read its considered statement on the Defence submissions regarding the comments made by the Secretary General of the UN, Kofi Annan, during his visit to the SCSL on 3 July 2006, at the beginning of proceedings on July 20th. On behalf of all three defence teams, Mr Jordash had argued that the reference made by Mr. Annan to the accused at the SCSL as criminals who had destroyed the country, was in violation of the rights of accused persons, enshrined in Article 17 of the Court’s Statute. The Chamber stated that “On the substance of Mr. Jordash’s submission that this Trial Chamber distances itself….from H E Kofi Annan’s comments so that it might prevent the Chamber from further damage to its standing in the international community as a result of said comments we issue the statement for the record.”The Presiding Judge carried on to say that the Chamber recognized the Secretary General’s authority to make political statements, however it also noted that “what is absolutely clear, is that the judges of the international judiciary are not bound by political statements made by the chief executive of the United Nations or by member states of the United Nations.” The Chamber also reiterated various relevant articles of the Statute, elaborating on the separation of powers between the executive organ of the UN, as an agent of the international community, and the Special Court, as a judicial organ.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #83

Trial Chamber II – AFRC Trial

Week Ending 21 July 2006

This week saw the continuation of the Defence case with 12 crime-base witnesses testifying. The witnesses all testified as common witnesses and the Prosecution conducted little cross-examination, allowing the proceedings to progress at a steady pace. However, the Defence still appears to be having difficulty organising for witnesses to be available to testify before the Court. Also this week the first status conference in the Charles Taylor case was held in the Hague before Judge Lussick. Proceedings in the AFRC trial were therefore adjourned on Friday morning until the following week.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #83a

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 14 July 2006

The 4th week of the current RUF trial session saw the closed session testimony of both an insider witness as well as an expert witness for the Prosecution, who is set to close their case by the end of this session. The expert witness testified about the involvement of children under the age of 15 with RUF fighting forces during the conflict in Sierra Leone, as charged in Count 12 of the Indictment. The Prosecution also tendered a report authored by the expert witness in question, which, despite vigorous objections by the defence, was admitted into evidence by Trial Chamber I. In its decision the Chamber reiterated its flexible approach to the admissibility of evidence, in line with other international criminal trials.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #82a

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 7 July 2006

This week’s proceedings saw the closed session testimony of two protected witnesses for the Prosecution. Various concerns regarding the protection system offered to witnesses by the Court was thrown into question after Witness TF1-334 expressed fear that his identity would be revealed and recalled earlier intimidation he had experienced by investigators. While defence counsel contended that this represented a ruse by the witness to extract greater benefit from the Witness and Victims Services (WVS) Unit, given that his identity was already well known prior to his testimony, the Chamber took the witness’ fears very seriously and indicated their deep concern that the protection system was failing.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #81a

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 30 June 2006

The second week of the eighth RUF trial session saw the testimony of two important witnesses, one being a UN military observer who was held hostage by the RUF during the Disarmament Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) process in 2000 and the other being a former RUF-combatant who was forced to join the RUF after being kidnapped from his village as a child. The defence also had the opportunity to cross-examine Prosecution witness Alfred Sesay, for whom the Prosecution submitted a solemn declaration in lieu of having him give oral testimony.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #80a

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 23 June 2006

The eighth session of the RUF accused trial began this week with a Status Conference on 19 June 2006. The trial session is scheduled to continue until 3 August 2006, inclusive. The health of the first accused, Issa Sesay, figured prominently in the Status Conference: Sesay continues to await surgery for a bullet wound in his hip. The Registry’s efforts to complete the required administrative and legal processes to allow for the procedure to be conducted outside Sierra Leone appear to have reached a stalemate, with defence counsel having no further update as to the progress on this issue.

Read Full Report in PDF

Special Court Monitoring Program Update #75

Trial Chamber I – RUF Trial

Week Ending 31 March 2006

This week’s proceedings touched on several important legal and procedural issues, particularly concerning representation for the third accused. The matter of representation was not seen in isolation: the issue invoked a debate in front of the Trial Chamber regarding the legal propriety of actions taken by the Principal Defender and his Office, as well as regarding the proper role of the Defence Office. The Principal Defender advocated for the addition of a competent Sierra Leonean counsel to the defence team in question, which is, at the present moment, composed entirely of international counsel. However, the relationship between lead counsel and the accused has seemingly been irreparably damaged, something that, according to Mr. O’Shea, was brought about by the actions of the Defence Office. Not only did these proceedings highlight tensions inherent in the accused’s right to choose counsel, they also publicly exposed perceived fractures within the Defence Office, a lack of communication between the Office and assigned counsel and confusion over the actual role of the Office, all of which are likely to impact the quality of the defence.

Read Full Report in PDF

KRT Trial Monitor

From 4 to 8 May 2015, the Trial Chamber effectively completed the testimonies of two witnesses via v

As the first segment of the trial in Case 002/02 nears its end, the Trial Chamber held documentary h

After returning from a judicial recess for Khmer New Year, the Trial Chamber resumed its proceedings

In the final week of hearings before the Khmer New Year holiday, the Trial Chamber heard the stateme

This week, the Trial Chamber successfully heard the testimonies of three Civil Parties within two an